France has a funny bicameral system.
Both chambers of the parliament, the Assemblée nationale and the Sénat, get to debate on, amend and vote bills. But if they fail to agree on the same version of a bill, in the end the Assemblée nationale has the last word.
And so it is with the so-called “Loi Pacte“, first discussed on this blog post. There was some suspense as to what the bill would finally contain, as it bounced back and forth, being amended and dis-amended from one chamber to the other. But now the suspense has come to an end as the bill has been finally adopted and will become the law of the land.
Well, unless there is a last minute surprise, as the constitutionality of the bill will likely be challenged in front of the Conseil constitutionnel (our constitutional supreme court) by disgruntled members of parliament.
The final text is here and it is 408 pages long (yes, that is some packed Pacte). It has many different aspects, including some controversial ones – like the privatization of ADP (the company that runs Paris’ airports). It also contains some provisions on IP, including just a few ones on patent law – but they are very important provisions indeed.
Basically, the report that I previously made on the draft still stands, although the articles have been renumbered:
- The maximum duration of utility certificates will be brought from 6 years to 10 years (article 118).
- It will be possible to convert a utility certificate application into a patent application within a deadline which still needs to be determined, whereas only the opposite is possible as of today (article 118).
- The government is authorized to rule by way of an ordonnance in order to set up a procedure for third parties to oppose a granted patent (article 121).
- The INPI (French patent office) will be able to refuse a patent application if its subject-matter is not an invention or is excluded from patentability, in contrast with the current formulation, per which its subject-matter is “manifestly” not an invention or is “manifestly” excluded from patentability (article 122).
- The INPI will be able to refuse a patent application if its subject-matter is not novel or not inventive, in contrast with the current formulation, per which an application may be refused if it was not modified despite a “manifest” lack of novelty (article 122).
- Infringement actions will be time-barred five years after the day the right owner knew or should have known the last fact allowing them to act, as opposed to the current formulation, which is five years “from the facts” (article 124).
- The statute of limitations will no longer apply to patent nullity actions (article 124).
So, there you have it, I don’t know if it is spring or winter, but a new season is definitely coming.
So what next? Well, first we will have to carefully look at transitional provisions.
In this respect, I have noted the following:
- The new provisions on utility certificates shall enter into force when the implementing decree is published, or one year from the publication of the law at the latest.
- The timeline for the introduction of the opposition proceedings is still unclear, as it will depend on the regulations (ordonnance) that the government will issue.
- Provisions extending the scope of examination of patent applications by the INPI shall enter into force one year from the publication of the law.
- The new provision on the statute of limitations for nullity actions will immediately enter into force – but will have no effect on decisions that have become res judicata. It remains to be seen how this will be interpreted in practice.
The bottom line is that, regarding the biggest changes for patent applicants, patent attorneys and the patent office, we have some time to get prepared – but we all know how that usually flies.
The nitty-gritty of the new system is still unclear and will require our full attention.
Moreover, another question mark is how the INPI will adapt to this upheaval.
Based on a report on a meeting between the INPI management and representatives of the patent profession a few weeks ago, the following seems to be contemplated at present:
- The projected date of entry into force of the patent opposition proceedings is January 1, 2020 (this is quite ambitious).
- The projected start of the examination of inventive step is mid-2021 (this is because the new law will only apply to newly filed applications, I presume).
- In terms of HR efforts, 15 patent examiners currently working on a backlog of national search reports will be redeployed to deal with opposition cases, and 16 new patent examiners will be hired to deal in particular with the increased workload related to the examination proceedings.
We also learn from this report that the new French “provisional patent application“, that we have heard of a number of times, is not dead. It should be created soon by way of a government decree.
I am curious to know what such a provisional application will look like. So far, patent professionals have been extremely skeptical about this – to put it mildly.
According to one apocryphal anecdote, President Macron was told by a French start-upper a few years ago that U.S. law is much more favorable to innovators than French law, because they have provisional applications in the U.S.
As a reminder, filing a French patent application without claims and without paying any taxes gives you a filing date, which is all you need to later claim priority. So, if there is any truth to this anecdote, it probably means that our President never met a French patent attorney – or at least that such a meeting did not leave as strong an impression as the ones he had with start-up folks. Which, let’s face it, is quite understandable.